Hello! I have been using your decks for a while, which are really nice for studying, thanks alot for making them. I have however run into a problem today, I updated anki to 2.1.49 and now the cards don’t work anymore. I get this error: Front template has a problem:
Found ‘{{#}}’, but there is no field called ‘’
Could you help? Thanks in advance.
FIX: In the card note style, you need to delete all the read me lines.
Front and Back, style part doesn’t matter. {#}} and {{/}} as well.
Replied on discord.
Hi, love your all in one kanji deck, but the production card for twig has the wrong bottom kanji (shows water instead of tree).
I found the field where I could correct it, but no idea what all the numbers mean/which ones to change… do you have a guide on this please? Went through your website, but couldn’t find anything.
Thank you!
Hi,
You’re right. The card uses the chinese version of the kanji instead of the japanese one.
I used the data from another website, so I’ll try to them know of the issue.
If they fix it, I’ll fix the deck as well.
Fixed it myself, should work.
Sorry, I don’t know how to update the deck. I re-downloaded it, but when I try to import in Anki it says 2277 notes couldn’t be imported due to note type change, and 51 are already in the collection. (I tried to open the download to get to just that one card, but every time it still tries to import).
You can try to delete that card before reimporting the deck.
Otherwise, here’s the change;
{“strokes”: [“M434,709C450,726 465,746 489,759C496,764 498,771 497,780C496,788 489,801 475,817C461,833 448,841 438,842C427,844 421,837 424,823C432,775 362,687 207,558C200,553 196,550 194,546C190,540 192,536 201,536C227,536 275,570 350,632C358,639 358,639 362,642C379,657 402,677 415,690C428,703 428,703 434,709Z”, “M542,538C573,570 603,609 636,651C648,667 661,681 678,689C687,694 692,698 693,703C693,711 685,721 670,732C649,748 635,757 627,757C620,758 613,754 606,751C541,728 466,714 434,709C425,707 407,695 415,690C445,674 495,681 569,705C579,709 587,706 591,702C593,700 589,687 576,663C557,631 534,597 503,566C487,550 487,550 479,542C400,464 299,407 175,371C169,370 166,369 166,365C166,363 168,360 173,359C242,347 332,375 438,447C459,462 485,482 515,511C533,529 533,529 542,538Z”, “M515,511C527,501 539,490 553,478C652,392 719,350 751,350C791,351 844,361 913,381C937,389 948,394 946,400C945,403 932,408 906,411C792,428 716,443 679,458C646,472 599,497 542,538C516,557 516,557 503,566C481,582 461,598 440,615C413,637 378,645 362,642C357,641 346,636 350,632C352,630 356,626 364,622C388,612 427,587 479,542C503,521 503,521 515,511Z”, “M537,268C571,272 682,275 868,273C882,273 891,275 895,281C899,290 894,300 883,309C845,338 814,348 787,343C725,332 643,318 542,305C504,300 504,300 485,298C382,286 272,275 154,263C139,262 136,257 148,243C157,234 169,226 182,222C196,218 209,217 221,220C290,239 365,250 444,258C506,265 506,265 537,268Z”, “M537,267C537,268 536,267 537,268C537,280 544,293 542,305C543,317 527,334 497,349C489,353 484,352 478,347C474,345 472,340 477,332C481,327 485,315 485,298C484,249 484,249 483,225C480,137 476,77 467,43C459,15 469,-18 497,-56C499,-60 502,-64 508,-66C513,-67 520,-63 524,-55C533,-34 534,-14 534,5C530,131 534,197 536,235C537,256 537,256 537,267Z”, “M444,258C409,190 311,117 152,39C139,33 138,29 148,25C154,23 197,28 224,38C365,93 432,159 483,225C511,259 464,298 444,258Z”, “M536,235C592,175 651,117 712,61C728,47 748,39 773,39C817,39 864,44 912,54C924,56 930,59 931,62C931,67 927,71 918,74C886,85 851,95 814,105C735,129 677,167 537,267C529,274 530,244 536,235Z”], “medians”: [[[432, 834], [449, 767], [314, 626], [201, 546]], [[423, 691], [607, 730], [640, 694], [421, 463], [287, 391], [173, 364]], [[358, 634], [724, 401], [937, 398]], [[148, 256], [206, 243], [794, 309], [891, 290]], [[479, 344], [513, 302], [509, -61]], [[479, 254], [342, 122], [152, 32]], [[541, 257], [748, 85], [924, 63]]]}
It worked, thank you very much!
Hi, me again, sorry!
The production card for presents (RTK 6th ed. #503) has the wrong kanji on the right side (a Chinese version of “increase” maybe?)
Incorrect:
Correct:
I also have a problem with the production card for “attractive” (RTK 6th ed. #430), that doesn’t generate any strokes but I think that’s due to extra spaces between each stroke codes (I’m slowly removing them, hopefully that will fix it!).
Don’t apoligize, I need you.
The deck is now better thanks to you.
I corrected all four kanji that had the chinese component instead of the japanese one.
I didn’t’ have the date for “attractive”, so I combined the data from two other kanji. So the component kinda supperpose but I think that’s okay.
If you see more issues, let me know.
I have another one, RTK 4th #452 Production card for “Audience”, the last 2/3 strokes are incorrect:
Shows:
But should be just a spoon (screenshot from 453 “Brown”):
Thanks!
Fixed !
If you ever get the time (as I’m sure it would be a big job), could you include the primitives in the RTK all-in-one deck please? I came across this Github thread that makes it sound like it’s now doable (I came across it when looking for actual characters of the primitives (instead of pictures) to paste in the existing deck.
https:// github .com /cyphar/heisig-rtk-index (added spaces in the link so I could paste)
Thank you!
They already were.
But RTK is full of mistakes, so I corrected them.
It’s the components field in the anki deck. I still left the RTK naming for each primitive.
Hey @Jo-Mako , as per your request, I have made a Drive with the sources I used to add Kanji Frequency to your deck. I explained what is what on the “TO READ” doc in it. I can’t add the link here apparently, but I posted in on my comment in your Deck’s comment section 
Thanks again for your awesome work & good luck to everyone learning Japanese,
Ulysse
Yes I just saw, thanks.
I’ll take a look when I can, but I’m moving out tomorrow.
Starting a new job Monday, so it may took a while before I take the time to focus on this.
Another one where the Chinese version is showing for the “tree”:
RTK 4th #562: “Miscellaneous” - no rush, and good luck with your move!
Hello,
I was wondering if you planned on making a deck for Pokémon Legends: Arceus.
Yes, but really don’t wait on it.
I’ll probably do the new Diamond first, so Arceus might be 2023 for all I know.
Should be ok now.