I understand your point here, but burying is intrinsically related to how and when cards are studied, not to how cards are created, so it seems like the Options preset is the right place for it. In the same way you’re worried about having double the decks and double the presets now – with what you’re proposing, you’d have to worry about having double the note types, which seems much more complicated.
The other important point is that a core feature like sibling burying can’t really be moved in this way – it would be too disruptive to existing collections. If someone were interested in taking this up, they would have to figure out a way to have burying settings in 2 different spheres and have the scheduler be able to rely on either one.
I suspect these recent discussions are yours too.
If not, and it’s just something bubbling up all over – it’s probably still worth connecting them up because of their overlaps.
Im newbie here, so for me is quite hard to draw a line between studying cards and creation of cards (for studing). But I imagine there is a line between structure of knowledge and descisions when to study. Can we say that notes defines structure and decks when to study?
In that case we can split bury-settings into two parts: what and when.
Logically the decision about what kind of siblings we deal with (does they interfere with each other) related to structure and notes. And when to study them (should it be buried for 1, 10 or 0 days) - to decks.
Consider these two notes:
{{c1:Resilient}} is {{c2:Able to withstand or recover quickly from difficult conditions.}}
List Inner Planets: {{c1:Mercury}}, {{c2:Venus}}
these create cards with very different relations. In the first note two cards spoil each other, in the second - they dont. And this is not a question of how and when to study, it is a property of knowledge which note contains. All I say is that it should be regulated in the note itself.
I think this also allows to avoid the technical issue you mention.