You are speaking of interference and it is a real thing. I have had this on my mind for quite a while now.
If the size of decks and the rate of card number growth have a major role, wouldn’t it be wise to look into how they influence retention generally
I have started a new deck because of my new semester. For the past week, I have been successful in fully clearing any reviews of that deck, and I have consistently clocked true retention rates lower than 95% (my desired retention).
[image]
Since I have no backlog (which I suspected earlier to be the main reason) and this deck is in co…
I want to share this:
As I am learning for my state medical examination, I am trying to power through all my medical Anki cards that I have amassed over 2 years.
In my medical cards collection of 67,951 cards, which have not all been made at the same time but through a continuous and painful process, 9743 cards have failed. This translates into a true retention of 85.6%. My desired retention is set at 95%. This process has taken place at an average of 3000 cards per day so I don’t know if this…
Thanks. The parameters deny my hypothesis. Seems FSRS have systematic error here in your case.
I suppose it is very difficult to model. I am not sure how one could model the influence of a collection’s size AND its Rate of Growth on the Retention of learned cards (aka Interference).