I wish I could. But see the number of decks I use only for school.
It’s 11th+12th Science, mostly Biology. Tags are not that usable for my purpose.
I think this is a slippery slope argument. Having disperse siblings here vs FSRS parameters are not completly different things.
My thoughts are, if load balancing works just fine with disperse siblings then we wouldn’t need such complexity. From what Jake says that seems to be the case so I am not in fervent support of this.
I also intially thought this might be to complex to use (for users) and not too worthwhile to work upon (for devs). But as Jake said, people would configure it only once while creating a note type so the former wouldn’t be true if a short explanation is provided in a tool tip. The latter, whether it is worthwhile to develop this, is something that depends on 1) how crucial this feature is 2) how time-consuming development would be. It might not be a too crucial feature as I already hinted and might also just waste a lot of dev power, but I will leave these concerns to you guys.