One of the websites I have has been around since 2014; you can access https://web.archive.org/ and check the history.
You could use tools for each thing, like TinEye to find good images.
Regarding your decks, I will link them.
If I wanted credit for all of them, I would have uploaded them all to AnkiWeb, because they are very good decks.
When I started, I didnāt know how to automate anything; I did everything manually. I can tell you the sources of everything I created, but your interest is different.
There were many things I asked you for when I first met you, and that inspired me to learn programming because everything I wanted depended on other people and sometimes I faced many rejections. But I learned enough; I donāt have as much skill as you, but I learned a lot to automate my workflow and create tools.
I will refrain from answering several questions here, as it feels more like an interrogation than a conversation. Once you want to state your objective, I will be willing to talk.
Sure. I will remove all the links.
I am not saying that I did everything from scratch; I also used other materials. I searched for images, corrected texts, and edited new audio files. You can downvote all the decks again, I donāt care anymore. I just ask that you re-upload all of them because they will help many people. Thatās all I have to say. Oh, if you want me to transfer the account to you, I am also willing to transfer it so the decks remain active on AnkiWeb.
Spam started on 2024.06.01 and 2024.06.01
, now itās positive feedback.
Fake at the beginning of 2018-12-18 or 2018-12-19. Although itās not fair to delete only them, because it helped the decks advance.
4 decks are affected.
https://ankiweb.net/shared/by-author/1104981491
Iām reluctant to act without some sort of consensus on how this should be handled, and Iām not sure weāll easily get that, as this category is not notified for most users.
After reading, the situation seems to be a conflict of interest as multiple people are trying to monetize decks, and potentially using copyrighted material, so they just transformed the information from a copyrighted source into an Anki deck. Makes sense to aim at getting hits in their shared decks to increase revenue and diminish the competition. So I understand how a situation like this has unfolded.
Regarding the handling of this situation, I think no decision would satisfy all parties. My suggestion would be updating the TOS in the direction of āa malicious intent to manipulate votes, fake reviews, etc could lead to the suspension of your accountā. So everyone is treated fairly.
Having anonymous reviews leaves room for easy exploration of fake reviews. Itās a privacy tradeoff.
Cases would not be contemplated where people do the same for Anki decks but outside of the official Ankiweb website. I am aware some third-party websites are selling anki decks, including copies of decks freely available in ankiweb shared decks as well as decks full of copyright infringement content.