@sorata Thanks for the reply. And absolutely.
In the most general use case, one may have several hundred cards due in a day (e.g. 350). And say of those 350, the cards were created across 14 different days (e.g. 25 cards on 14 different days) each day of creation separated by a week or more. And an underlying assumption is that cards from the same date are likely more related than cards made on a different date.
With this example and that assumption, some users may prefer to review due cards in the order most distant from today, which may also be a inelegant way to have more topically related consecutive reviews. It may be more comfortable for users to review 25 related cards (Day #1 of 14), then 25 related cards (Day #2 of 14), … finally 25 related cards (Day #14 of 14) than 1 card (Day #1 of 14), 1 card (Day #3 of 14), 1 card (Day #12 of 14), 1 card (Day #1 of 14), … and so on, until reaching 350 cards for the day.