Yes. In my case, I would be only using one learning step (the again interval), while letting the next intervals not be 1d as is the case now, but let the <1d scheduler continue scheduling, if it is enabled that is. If not, then it continues as normal and the next interval is just a 1d interval (graduated to the next day).
What I am asking is that Learning Intervals and FSRS <1d scheduler be independent of each other and should function together, not whilst the other is taken out.