Thanks to Claude, I get the stability of cards where first_rating=again
and second_rating=good
:
There not exists an recommended learning step to satisfy all the three scenarios because the second learning step affects them all:
- If you firstly rate
again
and then rategood
in a new card, the interval is the 2nd learning step. - If you firstly rate
good
, the interval is the 2nd learning step. - If you firstly rate
hard
, the interval is (1st learning step + 2nd learning step) / 2.
However, the stabilities are different among above three scenarios:
- If we want to satisfy case one, the 2nd learning step should be 18h.
- If we want to satisfy case two, the 2nd learning step should be removed
- If we want to satisfy case three, the 2nd learning step should be 4h.
Here is another Steps Stats from a different collection:
Here is the PR:
Feedback is welcome.