The correlation coefficient between the average RMSE and the number of presets is virtually 0. Visually, I was expecting to see a U-shaped curve with a minimum that corresponds to the best number of presets, but nope. And according to the benchmark, RMSE is actually performs worse by 3-4% (relative) when FSRS is optimized on several presets rather than on the entire collection.
Note that I can’t extract the number of reviews per each preset from the file Jarrett gave me, only the total number of reviews across all presets.
P.S. Out of 9999 collections, the maximum number of presets is 130. So DerIshmaelite, your 273 (or whatever number it was) is literally off the charts.
EDIT: here’s the difference between the RMSE of FSRS-5 optimized on the entire collection and the average RMSE of FSRS-5 optimized on each preset.