Not only should Reverse Relative Overdueness be available in Anki, but I believe it should be the default sorting method for most decks and situations, especially now that we have FSRS. I’m not pushing for it to be the default right now—just making it available would be great. Side note: As I was f…

[image] DerIshmaelite: This discussion has taken a looooooong turn. I thought it was already decided that Reverse Relative Overdueness is the best order for a backlog, and that we need to decrease the number of sort orders, beginning with the least efficient ones. Let’s put a cap in the main …

The data in tables shows a different picture. I am also looking at seconds per memorised card as I think that’s a better metric to look at.

[image] Expertium: If the user can do literally any number of reviews per day, the order doesn’t matter. Literally, where did you pull this out from? There was a simulation with no review limit (9999 limit?).

Just in case, you calculated reviews/new correctly right? I mean reviews here equals (review cards + new cards), right? (interday learning too but we won’t have them in the simulations).

I’m not sure. Looking at Jarrett’s code, it’s not clear to me whether first reviews of new cards also count for the same day. I think they do

[image] Seconds per memorized card is important, but if an order cannot maintain retention at the desired level in the presence of a backlog, it’s not very useful

[image] Change the warning message Suggestions This message: [image] Can we update it according to new data from simulations? This was calculated using default parameters and .90 desired retention. The default limits can also potentially change. The ideal d…

PRL Desc is very close (but maybe noise is more) to R Desc. Maybe should Dae consider adding it :question:

I actually have an idea for what to do. Make the default sort order “Automatic” and then have another called “Custom”. The latter allows you to do all sorts of customisation and the former is decided by Anki. Here, as you can see R desc and R asc both have terrible knowledge acquisition rate. I thi…

We should be removing sort orders, not adding even more. There are too many of them already. [image]

Here, as you can see R desc and R asc both have terrible knowledge acquisition rate. Huh? I don’t see it at all. They all perform very similarly

Ordering Request: Reverse Relative Overdueness

Anki Suggestions

sorata October 1, 2024, 7:13pm 323

Topic		Replies	Views
Several FSRS-related suggestions FSRS	167	3012	October 29, 2024
Due Column - Changing Days (from Whole Numbers to Decimals in Scheduling) Suggestions	59	962	December 9, 2024
Non-SRS Custom scheduler? There's very little info about it Scheduling	15	398	November 22, 2024
A situation in which descending retrievability may not be the most efficient review sort order? Learning Effectively	11	415	April 9, 2026
Clarify what optimal retention means FSRS	77	3733	January 9, 2025

Ordering Request: Reverse Relative Overdueness

Related topics