# New Sort Oder: PSG

**URL:** <https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/new-sort-oder-psg/50600>\
**Category:** Suggestions\
**Created:** [October 11, 2024, 8:22pm UTC](https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/new-sort-oder-psg/50600 "2024-10-11T20:22:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rich70521](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forums.ankiweb.net/rich70521/32/1710_2.png) [@rich70521](https://forums.ankiweb.net/u/rich70521)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2024, 4:09pm UTC](https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/new-sort-oder-psg/50600/13 "2024-10-12T16:09:38Z")

</div>

> [@sorata](#):
>
> I’d also point out that when it comes `total_remembered`, `PSG_desc` is performing better than all other sort orders. (Note: `total_remembered` is amount you remember when the simulation ends i.e. when you’ve finished the twenty thousand `is:new` cards)

I want to reiterate my aspersions about `total_remembered` here (which filter down to `seconds_per_remembered_card `). I don’t think we should be using these as the objective function.

[https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/ordering-request-reverse-relative-overdueness/50051/358?u=rich70521](https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/ordering-request-reverse-relative-overdueness/50051/358)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/new-sort-oder-psg/50600)._