Simple issue - when I add “Retrievability” field to the card browser, I’ll get one value, but very often, if I actually inspect the cards and go to the Card Details (with date added, first review, etc.), I’ll get a completely different value. The one on the card seems correct intuitively (on my exa…

It’s this issue: [image] Set Due Date doesn't update the interval of card Development It makes the ivl not align with due, which may induce this problem: For example: I learnt this card today, and the due date is 2024-12-0, the interval is 4 days and R = 100%: [imag…

probably the same issue as described here. if so, the fix is already made [image] Bug: retrievability in browser doesn't match retrievability in Stats histogram FSRS The SchedTimingToday structure that is used in graphs/retrievability.rs isn’t properly initialized before …

Might be the same, as I’ve heavily used “Set Due Date” when going through Backlog. What I noticed was that intervals were very broken - e.g. I’d see a card with the interval 24 days, but 3 months after having actually seen it, and when I know it, the new interval is 1.5 months, which makes absolutel…

I don’t think it’s related to that, the differences can be huge and definitely not due to rounding.

[Earlier discussion on Reddit - The heart of the internet ] [image] ProbablyEritrea: and which were subject to using of the “Postpone Cards” Add-on (not the FSRS one). That Add-on is something I definitely still intend to use now and then (I know about the drawbacks, but it makes sense for me …

Yeah, that’s the one. I mean, I might be missing something, but my situation is as follows: I had a fairly long hiatus with an obscene backlog, and after coming back and going through it, my daily workload is… obscene as well. On 90+% of the days I manage it, but some days life just gets in the way …

[image] ProbablyEritrea: Is there a more reasonable way to handle that? If you’re not willing to use a catch-up deck, and you want to have more control about when those cards are handled than you would be able to get with Postpone – How about: take that one days’ cards and use Set Due Date to…

Okay, but how does it make sense that when I open a card that was last reviewed 6 months ago, and I know it, the new proposed interval is e.g. 2 months? I can’t wrap my head around the math in that. Like, I can live with the discrepancies between browser and card info if it makes no practical diffe…

Okay, but how does it make sense that when I open a card that was last reviewed 6 months ago, and I know it, the new proposed interval is e.g. 2 months? I can’t wrap my head around the math in that. That’s actually entirely possible. In FSRS, the “overdue bonus” or whatever you want to call it, i…

[image] ProbablyEritrea: Okay, but how does it make sense that when I open a card that was last reviewed 6 months ago, and I know it, the new proposed interval is e.g. 2 months? I can’t wrap my head around the math in that. The best we can tell you is – that’s how your collection looks. Part …

Discrepancy between Retrievability Stat in Card Info vs Card Browser

Anki FSRS

sorata April 24, 2025, 2:42pm 2

It’s this issue:

Not sure if it was fixed after that. @L.M.Sherlock ?

Topic		Replies	Views
Intervals do not always match desired retention FSRS	8	245	May 26, 2025
Mismatch between projected forgetting curve, card interval, and stability? FSRS	3	107	January 9, 2026
FSRS with known new cards FSRS	18	842	July 5, 2024
Trying to understand SM-2 interval calculation Scheduling	10	513	April 25, 2025
Interval goes down without any parameter changes (i.e. no optimization) FSRS	11	396	January 9, 2026

Discrepancy between Retrievability Stat in Card Info vs Card Browser

Related topics