# Add cards with \<1d intervals to Review Intervals

**URL:** <https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/add-cards-with-1d-intervals-to-review-intervals/47722>\
**Category:** Suggestions\
**Created:** [August 1, 2024, 11:59am UTC](https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/add-cards-with-1d-intervals-to-review-intervals/47722 "2024-08-01T11:59:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sorata](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forums.ankiweb.net/sorata/32/34115_2.png) [@sorata](https://forums.ankiweb.net/u/sorata)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2024, 11:59am UTC](https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/add-cards-with-1d-intervals-to-review-intervals/47722/1 "2024-08-01T11:59:46Z")

</div>

In the statistics screen, “Review Intervals” doesn’t have a bar for cards with \<1d intervals.

I suggest we change this and add a 0 day interval bar as other sections of the same screen do.

This will also mean the word “reviews” will be used with a consistent meaning in the same screen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dae](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forums.ankiweb.net/dae/32/65_2.png) [@dae](https://forums.ankiweb.net/u/dae)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2024, 9:24am UTC](https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/add-cards-with-1d-intervals-to-review-intervals/47722/2 "2024-08-02T09:24:27Z")

</div>

Review cards should always have an interval of 1 day or greater. If you use ‘set due date’ to make them due that day, they’ll still be given an interval of 1.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sorata](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forums.ankiweb.net/sorata/32/34115_2.png) [@sorata](https://forums.ankiweb.net/u/sorata)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2024, 6:49pm UTC](https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/add-cards-with-1d-intervals-to-review-intervals/47722/3 "2024-08-02T18:49:32Z")

</div>

My point was why in this description:

> Delays until reviews are shown again.

reviews mean review cards (`-is:learn`) but see this one from the same screen:

> The number of reviews due in the future.

where review means all reviews including `is:learn`. Isn’t this inconsistent? I would rather have “Review Intervals” include the `is:learn` cards than not just as “Future Due” does or “Reviews” does.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dae](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forums.ankiweb.net/dae/32/65_2.png) [@dae](https://forums.ankiweb.net/u/dae)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2024, 8:56am UTC](https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/add-cards-with-1d-intervals-to-review-intervals/47722/4 "2024-08-04T08:56:38Z")

</div>

I agree our usage of ‘reviews’ is inconsistent, but I don’t think the intervals of cards that haven’t graduated is particularly useful to show.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sorata](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forums.ankiweb.net/sorata/32/34115_2.png) [@sorata](https://forums.ankiweb.net/u/sorata)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2024, 8:31am UTC](https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/add-cards-with-1d-intervals-to-review-intervals/47722/5 "2024-08-05T08:31:05Z")

</div>

> [@dae](#):
>
> I don’t think the intervals of cards that haven’t graduated is particularly useful to show.

I agree but neither is showing cards with sub day stability in the stability graph.

If you believe it’s not worth changing the graph, may I change “reviews” to “review cards” instead (in the descrip, not the title)?

This is a larger issue I believe, that plagues even the manual. The other day, I read the section describing **Set Due Date** and it didn’t make sense for a day until I realised “reviews” meant “review cards” there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dae](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forums.ankiweb.net/dae/32/65_2.png) [@dae](https://forums.ankiweb.net/u/dae)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 5:28pm UTC](https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/add-cards-with-1d-intervals-to-review-intervals/47722/6 "2024-08-07T17:28:41Z")

</div>

> [@sorata](#):
>
> I agree but neither is showing cards with sub day stability in the stability graph.

I may be remembering incorrectly, but I thought that was requested by one of the FSRS regulars.

> [@sorata](#):
>
> may I change “reviews” to “review cards”

Sure. Thank you for your efforts on trying to make things easier to understand.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sorata](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forums.ankiweb.net/sorata/32/34115_2.png) [@sorata](https://forums.ankiweb.net/u/sorata)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 7:50pm UTC](https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/add-cards-with-1d-intervals-to-review-intervals/47722/7 "2024-08-07T19:50:26Z")

</div>

> [@dae](#):
>
> but I thought that was requested by one of the FSRS regulars.

Expertium did but I don’t think it’s more useful than showing intervals of learning cards. Certainly a bit nicer when we nerds look at it.

edit: submitted a PR.